Cookie Settings
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Other cookies are those that are being identified and have not been classified into any category as yet.

No cookies to display.

VPN Safety

Split Horizon VPN: Unsafe At Any Speed


In “Your VPN Hates Your Video Conferencing. Here’s Why” I discussed why VPN’s often very negatively impact the performance of non-corporate applications. End users often complain of performance on YouTube, performance on video conferencing, VoIP issues, etc. But VPN users also complain, since the corporate network upstream becomes their downstream, and someone else watching Netflix reduces the performance of all users.

In each case, the reason is the same: in order to safely operate VPN, you must force all of the traffic into it. Companies often sacrifice security for performance by running what is called a ‘split horizon’ VPN. In a nutshell, a split-horizon VPN cherry-picks certain routes, forcing those to route into the VPN, but allowing others to use the default route, the default ISP. The end user may see this as better (since the performance is improved) but the security is dramatically reduced.

In “Bypassing Tunnels: Leaking VPN Client Traffic by Abusing Routing Tables“, the authors show just how dramatically that security is reduced. In particular, they note that 100% of VPN’s tested on iOS were insecure.

The attack vector is the routing table. Networks route to the most specific route (longest-prefix match). The corporate VPN, once configured for split-horizon, has a set of more-specific routes. A local ISP, wifi provider, etc, can in turn advertise even more specific routes, causing that traffic to be captured, altered, inspected…. things you do not want.

Is there a better solution? If the full-route VPN is too slow, and the split-horizon VPN is too weak, what should you do? We recommend a Zero Trust solution. In Zero-Trust Makes Working From Home Secure And Reliable, Unlike VPN, we discuss how making each resource available as its own, public endpoint, with appropriate authentication and authorisation, provides better performance, stronger security, simpler use. Everybody wins.

Read more of the Tunnelcrack paper including the author’s summary here.