Cookie Settings
Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Other cookies are those that are being identified and have not been classified into any category as yet.

No cookies to display.

Server Down

The Economic Cost Of Not Having Multi-Factor: MSP Lawsuit Edition


You are a small service company. You do work for your customers, you bill them for it. Suddenly, some miscreant sneaks in through your lightly secured infrastructure, sends them a change in billing information. Who is at fault? You for not securing? The customer for not checking? Well clearly the criminal owns some of the blame 🙂 These are the questions a judge in Mahoning County is being asked to solve in this lawsuit.

In BOARDMAN MOLDED PRODUCTS INC v INVOLTA LLC, the case is based on Boardman’s claim that Involta (their MSP) insufficiently secured its own (Involta’s) network, allowing a bad actor access to customer lists, and to send email with invalid invoices.

This plastic’s fabrication company then paid the invoices, totalling ~ $1.8M USD.

Involta was notified through a trouble ticket (and closed it as Fake News!).

So, where does the blame lie? Is Boardman responsible for overseeing all of their risk, including suppliers? Is Involta responsible for overseeing their own risk to their customers? Both?

Boardman hired Involta to handle complex technical matters, running a network, patching, etc, and thus relied on the advice and best practices of their supplier.

The details suggest there was no multi-factor authentication used, which is indeed a table-stakes best practice.

Interestingly, Boardman is sueing for the costs of dealing with the attack, but not the costs they paid out, so $25K rather than $1.8M.